NEWS

update:2023-06-19NO.: DOC230601-01

ECHA adds two hazardous chemicals to Candidate List

On 14 June 2023, ECHA has added two new hazardous chemical substances of very high concern (SVHC) to the Candidate List. The Candidate List of substances of very high concern (SVHCs) now contains 235 entries for chemicals that can harm people or the environment. The complete Candidate list can refer to the link:
https://echa.europa.eu/candidate-list-table.

Entries added to the Candidate List on 14 June 2023:

No.	Substance name	EC No.	CAS No.	Reason for proposing
01	Diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)phosphine oxide	278-355-8	75980-60-8	Toxic for reproduction (Article 57c)
02	Bis(4-chlorophenyl) sulphone	201-247-9	80-07-9	vPvB (Article 57 e)

For more information please check below link:
https://echa.europa.eu/-/echa-adds-two-hazardous-chemicals-to-candidate-list#msdynttrid=yADU43yzAh3mZzn73MW_nUL1DK6GCdgYVuPCw1a2znE

Solution

My Profession Your Excellence!
• Heshan Leo Metrology and Testing Services Co. Ltd.(LEO-MTS) can help to improve products quality for you, your supplier and your client.

To more information, please contact

Heshan Leo Metrology and Testing Services Co. Ltd.

Tel： 0750-8862565

Fax： 0750-8768244

Email： MTS@Leo-MTS.com

Website： http://www.leo-mts.com http://www.leo-mts.cn

LEO-MTS obtained the approval of CMA qualification Re-audit(2023-05-10)
Congratulations! LEO-MTS obtained the approval of CMA qualification extension(2022-07-29)
LEO-MTS 　　 Successfully Passed the CPSC Annual Audit(2022-06-14)
LEO-MTS successfully passed the CNAS re-audit and the recognition ability expansion assessment(2022-05-09)
CPSC Has Verified and Approved LEO-MTS’ Application of CPSC-Related Scope(2018-03-01)
LEO-MTS Was Conferred the Certificate of CMA
Leo-MTS provides testing service for EN71-3:2013(2014-04-28)
LEO-MTS Got Satisfactory Results in Participating the proficiency testing scheme summary in 2013(2014-03-17)

Disclaimer:Leo-MTS has tried all reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy of information, however the information provided should not be relied upon as legal advice or regarded as a substitute for legal advice; The reader should exercise his own care and judgment before replying on this information in any important matter.