NEWS

update:2016-03-04 NO.: DOC160301-01

ECHA launches a public consultation on four proposals to identify new substances of very high concern (SVHCs)

On 2 March 2016, ECHA launched a public consultation on new proposals to identify new 4 chemicals as substances of very high concern (SVHCs). All interested parties are invited to submit comments on such reports during the public consultation. The deadline for submitting information is 14 April 2016.

List of 4 New SVHC for Consultation:

No. Substance name EC No. CAS No. SVHC property
1
(±)-1,7,7-trimethyl-3-[(4-methylphenyl)methylene]bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane-2-one (4-methylbenzylidene camphor) 253-242-6 36861-47-9 Equivalent level of concern having probable serious effects to the environment (Article 57 f)
2
1,7,7-trimethyl-3-(phenylmethylene)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-one (3-benzylidene camphor) 239-139-9 15087-24-8 Equivalent level of concern having probable serious effects to the environment (Article 57 f)
3
Benzo[def]chrysene (Benzo[a]pyrene) 200-028-5 50-32-8 Carcinogenic (Article 57 a)
Mutagenic (Article 57 b)
Toxic for reproduction (Article 57 c)
PBT (Article 57 d)
vPvB (Article 57 e)
4
Dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP) 201-545-9 84-61-7 Toxic for reproduction (Article 57 c)
Equivalent level of concern having probable serious effects to human health and the environment (Article 57 f)

For further details, please refer to the below link:
http://echa.europa.eu/proposals-to-identify-substances-of-very-high-concern

Solution
My Profession Your Excellence!
• Heshan Leo Metrology and Testing Services Co. Ltd.(LEO-MTS) can help to improve products quality for you, your supplier and your client.
To more information, please contact
Heshan Leo Metrology and Testing Services Co. Ltd.

86 750- 8862659(Cindy Chan)
86 750- 8862659(Kelly Wong)
86 750-8862565(Mr. Liu)

86 750-8768244

MTS@Leo-MTS.com

http://www.leo-mts.com http://www.leo-mts.cn

more info
Copyright © 2011 HESHAN LEO METROLOGY AND TESTING SERVICES CO.LTD. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer:Leo-MTS has tried all reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy of information, however the information provided should not be relied upon as legal advice or regarded as a substitute for legal advice; The reader should exercise his own care and judgment before replying on this information in any important matter.